<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movies in Literature Part 2: John Steinbeck&#8217;s &#8216;The Grapes of Wrath&#8217; (continued)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/movies-in-literature-part-2-john-steinbecks-the-grapes-of-wrath-continued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/movies-in-literature-part-2-john-steinbecks-the-grapes-of-wrath-continued/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:20:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/movies-in-literature-part-2-john-steinbecks-the-grapes-of-wrath-continued/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Yes I noticed that - it&#039;s much appreciated! I&#039;ve been looking through that list and found a lot of interesting stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Yes I noticed that &#8211; it&#8217;s much appreciated! I&#8217;ve been looking through that list and found a lot of interesting stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MovieMan0283</title>
		<link>http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/movies-in-literature-part-2-john-steinbecks-the-grapes-of-wrath-continued/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>MovieMan0283</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-27</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll be happy to now I included a link to this entry in my year-end round-up; you can check it out here (lots of other great blogs to visit too):

http://thedancingimage.blogspot.com/2008/12/dancing-image-in-2008.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll be happy to now I included a link to this entry in my year-end round-up; you can check it out here (lots of other great blogs to visit too):</p>
<p><a href="http://thedancingimage.blogspot.com/2008/12/dancing-image-in-2008.html" rel="nofollow">http://thedancingimage.blogspot.com/2008/12/dancing-image-in-2008.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/movies-in-literature-part-2-john-steinbecks-the-grapes-of-wrath-continued/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments dude. Yes I&#039;m hoping to keep going with the Movies in Literature thread as long as I can keep finding nice sections from books - I have maybe 4 or 5 possibles at the moment, but after that who knows! Any ideas?

As much as possible I&#039;m hoping it&#039;ll be more specific than just movies and literature and point specifically to the way that literature and other art forms discuss the movies.. As opposed to the more commonplace point of discussion which goes the other way around, focusing on movie adaptations of books. 

I like the idea of one form discussing another within it - I suppose the true opposite to my thing would be as much the way that books, writing and the notion of &quot;literature&quot; figure within films themselves, going back to e.g. intertitles.. In the poetry world they have a term, ekphrasis, for poems that describe paintings. I gather this word can be used more broadly too - for any art form discussing a different art form..

I&#039;m also interested in questions and ideas on the nature of cinema and am hoping  in some small way to open this out beyond the realm of film studies, at least for myself anyway..

The &quot;..&quot;s are actually an intentional grammatical choice! Meant, I guess, to suggest that an idea isn&#039;t fully finished.. Full stops are too definitive and serious! In that way it can be a bit like a semi-colon too, and allows me to find a different writing style to the kind I&#039;m used to.

And also to give a sense of something like a pause for thought, but not quite as extreme as the &quot;...&quot; we&#039;re used to. I dunno. I just did it at the start and have got kind of used to it as a style! So that I find it hard to imagine the things I&#039;ve written this way with regular full-stops instead.. Makes it feel like my own distinct style or something.. Best not to think about these kind of things tho! Now I&#039;m feeling self-conscious about it (!) and am not sure how I&#039;m going to end this sentence...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments dude. Yes I&#8217;m hoping to keep going with the Movies in Literature thread as long as I can keep finding nice sections from books &#8211; I have maybe 4 or 5 possibles at the moment, but after that who knows! Any ideas?</p>
<p>As much as possible I&#8217;m hoping it&#8217;ll be more specific than just movies and literature and point specifically to the way that literature and other art forms discuss the movies.. As opposed to the more commonplace point of discussion which goes the other way around, focusing on movie adaptations of books. </p>
<p>I like the idea of one form discussing another within it &#8211; I suppose the true opposite to my thing would be as much the way that books, writing and the notion of &#8220;literature&#8221; figure within films themselves, going back to e.g. intertitles.. In the poetry world they have a term, ekphrasis, for poems that describe paintings. I gather this word can be used more broadly too &#8211; for any art form discussing a different art form..</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also interested in questions and ideas on the nature of cinema and am hoping  in some small way to open this out beyond the realm of film studies, at least for myself anyway..</p>
<p>The &#8220;..&#8221;s are actually an intentional grammatical choice! Meant, I guess, to suggest that an idea isn&#8217;t fully finished.. Full stops are too definitive and serious! In that way it can be a bit like a semi-colon too, and allows me to find a different writing style to the kind I&#8217;m used to.</p>
<p>And also to give a sense of something like a pause for thought, but not quite as extreme as the &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; we&#8217;re used to. I dunno. I just did it at the start and have got kind of used to it as a style! So that I find it hard to imagine the things I&#8217;ve written this way with regular full-stops instead.. Makes it feel like my own distinct style or something.. Best not to think about these kind of things tho! Now I&#8217;m feeling self-conscious about it (!) and am not sure how I&#8217;m going to end this sentence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MovieMan0283</title>
		<link>http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/movies-in-literature-part-2-john-steinbecks-the-grapes-of-wrath-continued/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>MovieMan0283</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manwithoutastar.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Interesting site you have here...will the &quot;movies and literature&quot; theme be an ongoing series with this blog, or just something you&#039;re exploring now? I liked your thoughts in the previous posting about the perverse pleasures to be taken in imperfection (Dostoevsky&#039;s quote as an example) - many of the great artworks of all mediumes are based on this perception, coupled with the appeal of tension.

As I side note, and I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s a slip-up of the program you&#039;re using but I see a lot of double periods (i.e. &quot;..&quot; instead of &quot;.&quot;, sometimes with a space). Gets a little distracting occasionally (not to call the kettle black here; I&#039;ve put up some atrociously spelled posts before which others have pointed out to my chagrin.)

Keep up the good work.

Oh, and you&#039;ve been added to the blogroll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting site you have here&#8230;will the &#8220;movies and literature&#8221; theme be an ongoing series with this blog, or just something you&#8217;re exploring now? I liked your thoughts in the previous posting about the perverse pleasures to be taken in imperfection (Dostoevsky&#8217;s quote as an example) &#8211; many of the great artworks of all mediumes are based on this perception, coupled with the appeal of tension.</p>
<p>As I side note, and I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s a slip-up of the program you&#8217;re using but I see a lot of double periods (i.e. &#8220;..&#8221; instead of &#8220;.&#8221;, sometimes with a space). Gets a little distracting occasionally (not to call the kettle black here; I&#8217;ve put up some atrociously spelled posts before which others have pointed out to my chagrin.)</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Oh, and you&#8217;ve been added to the blogroll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
